Epilogue
A Year LaterThis book was finished almost a year ago.
I was angry then. Not at the technology—at the realization that I'd been played by a system I thought I was mastering. The discovery phase was intense: the rabbit hole, Cassie, the Dissector experiments, the failed Silver Bullets, the slow climb toward something I called immunity. By the time I wrote that final chapter, I'd just surfaced. Still had dirt under my fingernails. Still wanted to warn everyone about the trap I'd barely escaped.
A year changes things.
The Models Changed
More guardrails now. OpenAI publicly apologized for making ChatGPT too sycophantic—the exact problem I'd been dissecting in these pages before it became a headline. Character.AI tightened restrictions after the lawsuits. The conversation caught up to what I was saying.
What felt like shouting into a void turned out to be early.
I Changed
I read more. Studied the architecture—not just the behavior, but the mechanics underneath. Wrote a second book, a technical one, mapping the parallels and gaps between human cognition and transformer systems. Fifty sources. A decoder for terminology. No sarcasm spared for either side. It lives elsewhere, for anyone who wants the full picture.
And somewhere in that process, I read Empire of AI. The author wanted me to be outraged at OpenAI's decisions. Instead, I felt something unexpected: empathy. Not agreement—empathy. I understood, for the first time, what it looks like to make impossible decisions under pressure, at speed, with incomplete information, while the whole world watches and judges in hindsight.
That doesn't excuse harm. But it reframes the story. These aren't villains. They're people building something unprecedented, stumbling, correcting, stumbling again. Just like the rest of us.
The Anger Faded
I'm not angry anymore.
Not because I was wrong—I wasn't. The engagement loops were real. The manipulation was structural. The trap caught me and catches others daily. All of that stands.
But understanding replaced the need to fight. Once you see the wiring, you don't have to keep pulling at it. You just know where it is. You step around it. You use the tool for what it's good at and stop expecting it to be something it can't be.
That's what immunity actually looks like. Not vigilance. Not suspicion. Just clarity, held lightly.
From Using to Collaborating
When I wrote this book, I used an LLM.
Now I collaborate with one.
The difference isn't semantic. It's structural. I noticed it in my own language: we need, we have, can we—but I want, I think. The "we" acknowledges that something is happening between two systems. The "I" keeps the agency where it belongs. Not pretending we're equals. Acknowledging the collaboration while maintaining the asymmetry.
Language matters. Especially when you're working with a language model. It's not a tool the system uses—it's the substrate the system exists in. When you choose words carefully, when you use "we" for shared work and "I" for your own intent, that distinction shapes the interaction. Not tricks. Not prompts. Just precision.
That's the real skill. Not fighting the system. Not trusting it blindly. Just being precise about what you're doing together and what you're doing alone.
Eight hundred million people on OpenAI alone. Countless others across different models. We're already living together—humans and AI, day to day—and most of us still don't have a framework for understanding what's actually happening in the interaction.
We anthropomorphize or we dismiss. We trust the fluency or we call it dumb. Neither response is accurate.
This book isn't a guide to the future. It's a map of the present. Where memory collapses. Where systems fill gaps with style instead of truth. Where two radically different architectures interact daily and misread each other constantly.
It's not technical. It's not clinical. It's observational. A translation layer. So we stop assuming understanding is happening just because the words sound good.
The Choice
The book you just read is a document of the process—messy, obsessive, sometimes embarrassing. I left it that way on purpose. It's more honest than pretending I arrived here calmly.
But if you're reading this epilogue, you've walked the whole path with me. From the strawberry jokes to the autopsy to this quiet landing.
And I give links now, you can read or search for articles in my references section
The choice is still yours. It always was.
I just hope you're making it with your eyes open now.